· 7/9/2013
United States v. Prince Bey
Citations
- 725 F.3d 643
- 2013 WL 3455695
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 13793
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that defendant waived entrapment for appellate review after he withdrew his proposed jury instruction on it
- “Because this admitted conversation did not implicate Bey in the alleged conspiracy, we see no possibility that there was any error, let alone prejudicial error . . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Posner, Wood, Hamilton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.