Skip to main content
· 7/9/2013

United States v. Prince Bey

Citations

  • 725 F.3d 643
  • 2013 WL 3455695
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 13793

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that defendant waived entrapment for appellate review after he withdrew his proposed jury instruction on it
  • “Because this admitted conversation did not implicate Bey in the alleged conspiracy, we see no possibility that there was any error, let alone prejudicial error . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Wood, Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.