United States v. Prevatte

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an officer who was driving to a site of a suspected homicide was not entitled to sovereign immunity because there was no evidence of an immediate threat to public safety
• noting that the employment of law enforcement officers relates directly to the “Commonwealth’s interest and function . . . to protect the public safety”
• denying immunity to a police officer who was driving to a site of a suspected homicide where there was no evidence of an immediate threat to public safety

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).