UNITED STATES v. PRECIOUS THERÉSE FEARMAN

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the true measure of the intended loss is “in the defendant’s mind.”
• explaining that although it was difficult to determine what benefit the defendant thought she might gain from the fraud, an intended loss “is not a realistically expectable loss ... [but,] it must exist at least in the defendant’s mind.”
• explaining that although it was difficult to determine what benefit the defendant thought No. 04-3440 7 she might gain from the fraud, an intended loss “is not a realistically expectable loss . . . [but,] it must exist at least in the defendant’s mind.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).