Skip to main content
· 2/28/2007

United States v. Portillo-Vega

Citations

  • 478 F.3d 1194
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 4440
  • 2007 WL 603048

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Bailey , which dealt with the defense of necessity, \is ... central to a discussion of the duress defense\
  • holding that duress evidence was properly excluded where defendant failed to proffer evidence on each element of the defense
  • holding that to be entitled to present a duress defense to the jury, a defendant must proffer legally sufficient evidence as to each element of the defense
  • viewing evidence favorable to the defendant when reviewing district court’s decision precluding duress defense upon government’s motion in limine
  • precluding, duress defense altogether after pretrial hearing, which was consented to by both parties
  • rejecting defendant’s claim he had absolute right to have jury consider his defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Briscoe, Anderson, O'Brien

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.