· 2/28/2007
United States v. Portillo-Vega
Citations
- 478 F.3d 1194
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 4440
- 2007 WL 603048
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Bailey , which dealt with the defense of necessity, \is ... central to a discussion of the duress defense\
- holding that duress evidence was properly excluded where defendant failed to proffer evidence on each element of the defense
- holding that to be entitled to present a duress defense to the jury, a defendant must proffer legally sufficient evidence as to each element of the defense
- viewing evidence favorable to the defendant when reviewing district court’s decision precluding duress defense upon government’s motion in limine
- precluding, duress defense altogether after pretrial hearing, which was consented to by both parties
- rejecting defendant’s claim he had absolute right to have jury consider his defense
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Briscoe, Anderson, O'Brien
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.