United States v. Ponce-Guzman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “Mississippi’s stop notice statute violates due process by authorizing what is in practical effect the prejudgment attachment of funds without prior notice and a hearing, or an acceptable post-seizure remedy.”
• holding that “Mississippi’s stop notice statute violates due process by authorizing what is in practical effect the prejudgment attachment of funds without prior notice and a hearing, or an acceptable post-seizure remedy.”
• “The interpleader statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1335, confers jurisdiction over cases with only ‘minimal diversity,’ that is, diversity between two or more claimants rather than complete diversity between the stakeholder plaintiff and the defendant claimants.” (citations omitted)
• “Rule 22 . . . does not provide an independent basis for jurisdiction; a rule interpleader action must be supported by some other source of jurisdiction, such as 28 U.S.C. § 1331 or 28 U.S.C. § 1332.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).