Skip to main content
· 9/21/1999

United States v. Poling

Citations

  • 73 F. Supp. 2d 882
  • 84 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6485
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15748
  • 1999 WL 1001572

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that assignment of “all [the assignor’s] right, title, and interest in” certain monthly income payments raised triable issue of fact as to whether it was collateral or total under Ohio law, given the context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Abel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.