United States v. Plumer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Superior Court “commit[s] error by depriving [a party] of her right to be heard” in dismissing an action sua sponte without providing notice or a chance to respond
• assuming without deciding that section 3408(a) of the VITCA was jurisdictional
• “[T]he denial of the right to be heard in a civil case is subject to harmless error review.”
• there are “many provisions — even in statutes — that . . . are . . . subject to waiver”
• “[T]he Superior Court could take judicial notice of the May 9, 2008 Judgment and Commitment . . . .”
• “[T]he Restatements no longer constitute the rales of decision in Virgin Islands courts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).