United States v. Pitney Bowes, Inc., Edo Corporation Plessey, Inc. Vernitron Corp., Baii Banking Corp., Movant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that intervention would delay agreed-upon cleanup of Superfund site and require parties \to begin negotiations again from scratch\
• noting that reversal of denial of permissive intervention is so rare that it is unique
• ruling that “intervention might not be protected rather than waiting until the danger to decisions are reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard” that interest becomes certain. Floyd v. City of New York, 302 and making timely motion is “first hurdle”
• stating that undue delay or prejudice is “[t]he principal guide in deciding whether to grant permissive intervention”
• noting that undue delay or prejudice is “[t]he principal guide in deciding whether to grant permissive intervention”
• noting that undue delay or prejudice is “[t]he principal guide in deciding whether to grant permissive intervention”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).