· 12/5/2007
United States v. Pimentel-Hernandez
Citations
- 256 F. App'x 722
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “a pattern of lustful intent” was circumstantial evidence relating to all charges in the case
- “a pattern of lustful intent” was circumstantial evidence relating to all charges in the case
- sodomy and indecent liberties held separate offenses
- cit- ing MIL. R. EVID. 404(b)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Higginbotham, Jolly, Prado
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.