United States v. Pierre Guevremont

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing probation order to be vacated or allowing a defendant to avoid consequences of violating probation would thwart the intent of the court’s sentencing plan
• construing district court's subsequent alteration of illegal split sentence under Rule 36 as a corrective order pursuant to Rule 35(a)
• rejecting use of Rule 36 where the court failed to announce that the defendant was placed on probation but later cor- rected it in a written order
• where increase of sentence results from correction of sentence to conform to original intent of sentencing judge, Federal Double Jeopardy Clause is not violated
• clerical error “must not be one of judgment or even of misidentification, but merely of recitation, of the sort that a clerk or amanuensis might commit, mechanical in nature”
• \We believe that the cases mentioned above support the view that . . . the district court's order corr ecting the illegal sentence was appropriate and does not bring to bear double jeopardy concerns of possible judicial vindictiveness.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).