United States Court of Military Appeals· 6/26/1964
United States v. Phillips
Citations
- 14 C.M.A. 620
- 14 USCMA 620
- 34 C.M.R. 400
- 1964 CMA LEXIS 222
- 1964 WL 5036
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- an original allotment form seemingly has efficacy to deprive the victim of the forgery of a portion of his pay
- falsely made copy of allotment authorization not a proper subject of forgery — even though false document successfully used to defraud insurance company — because regulation required original form in order to create, change, or terminate allotment
- false copy of an allotment authorization
- carbon copies of an allotment authorization
- a copy of an allotment authorization
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ferguson, Kilday, Quinn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1988-02-22· cited 29×
- United States v. LyonUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1965-04-02· cited 26×
- United States v. WilsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1982-06-28· cited 24×
- United States v. SchwarzUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1983-03-14· cited 22×
- United States v. HopwoodUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1990-05-17· cited 16×
- United States v. DavisU S Air Force Court of Military Review· 1978-01-20· cited 5×
- United States v. PetersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1964-12-24· cited 4×
- United States v. SchwarzU.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1981-09-10· cited 4×
- United States v. NicholsU S Air Force Court of Military Review· 1989-01-31· cited 3×
- United States v. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 1995-08-23· cited 2×
- United States v. JohnsonArmy Court of Criminal Appeals· 1997-02-05· cited 2×
- United States v. DriggersUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1972-05-12· cited 1×
- United States v. RossU.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1988-08-11· cited 1×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. StrandUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1955-09-02· cited 89×
- United States v. RoweUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1962-09-14· cited 56×
- People v. MunroeCalifornia Supreme Court· 1893-12-30· cited 50×
- United States v. DavisUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1961-12-22· cited 42×
- United States v. FarleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1960-08-02· cited 27×
- United States v. AddyeUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1957-03-15· cited 22×
- Commonwealth v. DunleayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1892-11-23· cited 17×
- United States v. DavisSupreme Court· 1913-12-01· cited 15×
- United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1958-09-19· cited 11×
- United States v. NoelUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1960-06-03· cited 8×
- United States v. JacksonUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1962-05-04· cited 8×
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. HoustonSupreme Court· 1913-12-01· cited 7×
- United States v. BrysonUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1953-09-11· cited 7×
- United States v. WhitsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1963-12-20· cited 6×
- Commonwealth v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1902-04-30· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.