United States v. Phillip Leclair

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding continued commitment where patient had “little insight into his mental illness and need for treatment” and there was “no assurance of compliance with treatment outside a strac-r tured setting”
• dangerousness proven by clear and convincing evidence where defendant had only one aggressive act, an assault, and had not shown any aggressive behavior while in treatment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).