United States v. Phillip Grandinetti, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A jury is permitted to infer from one fact the existence of another essential to guilt, if reason and experience support the inference.” (cleaned up)
• “A jury is permitted to infer from one fact the existence of another essential to guilt, if reason and experience support the inference.” (cleaned up)
• “A jury is permitted to infer from one fact the existence of another essential to guilt, if reason and experience support the inference.” (cleaned up)
• “A jury is permitted to infer from one fact the existence of another essential to guilt, if reason and experience support the inference.” (cleaned up)
• “A jury is permitted to infer from one fact the existence of another essential to guilt, if reason and experience support the inference.” (cleaned up)
• “A jury is permitted to infer from one fact the existence of another essential to guilt, if reason and experience support the inference.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).