Skip to main content
· 4/8/1993

United States v. Phillip Fairchild

Citations

  • 990 F.2d 1139
  • 38 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,513
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 4441
  • 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2602
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 7288
  • 1993 WL 101917

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “what matters is whether [the defendant] brought about the criminal act through his own conduct”
  • finding liability under § 2(b) because defendant’s actions caused false statements to be made to the government
  • finding liability under § 2(b) because defendant’s actions caused false statements to be made to the government
  • \[T]he criminal intent essential to the commission of the crime must exist at the time of the criminal act.\ (quoting United States v. Fox, 95 U.S. 670, 671 (1877))
  • \[T]he criminal intent essential to the commission of the crime must exist at the time of the criminal act.\ (quoting United States v. Fox, 95 U.S. 670, 671, 24 L.Ed. 538 (1877))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fletcher, Noonan, Reinhardt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.