· 4/8/1993
United States v. Phillip Fairchild
Citations
- 990 F.2d 1139
- 38 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,513
- 93 Daily Journal DAR 4441
- 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2602
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 7288
- 1993 WL 101917
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “what matters is whether [the defendant] brought about the criminal act through his own conduct”
- finding liability under § 2(b) because defendant’s actions caused false statements to be made to the government
- finding liability under § 2(b) because defendant’s actions caused false statements to be made to the government
- \[T]he criminal intent essential to the commission of the crime must exist at the time of the criminal act.\ (quoting United States v. Fox, 95 U.S. 670, 671 (1877))
- \[T]he criminal intent essential to the commission of the crime must exist at the time of the criminal act.\ (quoting United States v. Fox, 95 U.S. 670, 671, 24 L.Ed. 538 (1877))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fletcher, Noonan, Reinhardt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.