United States v. Philip Lowenthal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• generally improper, but cf. United States v. Cramer, 447 F.2d 210, 219 (2nd Cir., 1971) (instruction should have been given, although its omission was harmless)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).