Skip to main content
· 6/1/1994

United States v. Philip Allen Carman, III

Citations

  • 25 F.3d 1050
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21042
  • 1994 WL 236493

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant may offset actual loss by amount on deposit at time of apprehension, but restitution made after apprehension cannot properly offset actual loss from a check-kiting scheme

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.