United States v. Philip A. Kaiser Douglas M. Mueller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Powell explicitly rejected the notion that the Internal Revenue Service was required to demonstrate the existence of probable cause for its investigations which used the broad summons power given to the IRS by section 7602 of the Internal Revenue Code.”
• “Powell explicitly rejected the notion that the Internal Revenue Service was required to demonstrate the existence of probable cause for its investigations which used the broad summons power given to the IRS by section 7602 of the Internal Revenue Code.”
• “Powell explicitly rejected the notion that the Internal Revenue Service was required to demonstrate the existence of probable cause for its investigations which used the broad summons power given to the IRS by section 7602 of the Internal Revenue Code.”
• “Powell explicitly rejected the notion that the Internal Revenue Service was required to demonstrate the existence of probable cause for its investigations which used the broad summons power given to the IRS by section 7602 of the Internal Revenue Code.”
• “Powell explicitly rejected the notion that the Internal Revenue Service was required to demonstrate the existence of probable cause for its investigations which used the broad summons power given to the IRS by section 7602 of the Internal Revenue Code.”
• “Powell explicitly rejected the notion that the Internal Revenue Service was required to demonstrate the existence of probable cause for its investigations which used the broad summons power given to the IRS by section 7602 of the Internal Revenue Code.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).