United States v. Petroff-Kline

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that requests seeking purely legal conclusions are not permitted under Rule 36
• noting that the “failure to respond in a timely fashion does not require the court automatically to deem all matters admitted”
• noting that the “failure to respond in a timely fashion does not require the court automatically to deem all matters admitted”
• noting that the “failure to respond in a timely fashion does not require the court automatically to deem all matters admitted”
• noting that the “failure to respond in a timely fashion does not require the court automatically to deem all matters admitted”
• noting that the “failure to respond in a timely fashion does not require the court automatically to deem all matters admitted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).