United States v. Petreikis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that revocation sentences are reviewed for abuse of discretion under same “reasonableness” standard that applies to initial sentencing proceedings; within-Guidelines-range revocation sentence is accorded presumption of reasonableness on appeal
• explaining that “[w]e review a revocation sentence under the same ‘reasonableness’ standard that applies to initial sentencing proceedings” and that a within-Guidelines-range sentence is accorded a presumption of reasonableness on appeal
• explaining that a revocation sentence is reviewed “under the same ‘reasonableness’ standard that applies to initial sentencing proceedings” and that “[a] sentence within the Guidelines range is accorded a presumption of substantive reasonableness on appeal” (citations omitted
• applying a presumption of substantive reasonableness to a revocation sentence within the Guidelines range
• applying a presumption of substantive reasonableness to a revocation sentence within the Guidelines range
• applying a presumption of reasonableness to a revocation sentence within the Guidelines range

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).