United States v. Peter Zagorski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the district court properly applied § 2G2.1(b)(6)(B) when a defendant sent sexually explicit material of a minor to another person and also solicited that person to engage in sexual activity with a minor
• affirming the district court’s application of § 2G2.1(b)(6)(B) when the defendant sent sexually-explicit material of a minor to another person and also solicited that person to engage in sexual activity with a minor
• defendant requested sexually explicit videos of minor in online chat
• defendant requested sexually explicit videos of minor in online chat

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).