Skip to main content
· 3/29/1993

United States v. Peter J. Regan

Citations

  • 989 F.2d 44
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 6330

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that application of revised guidelines to offenses that occurred both before and after revision did not violate Ex Post Facto Clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Aldrich, Stahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.