United States v. Peter Evangelista and Anthony Evangelista, Louis Evangelista and Claude Evangelista

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that defendants are not entitled to rely on alleged advice that “deferring” tax payments was proper where defendants did not follow that advice
• analogizing tax law professional advice defenses to the advice of counsel defense
• “[D]efendants are not necessarily entitled to have the exact language of the charge they submitted to the district court read to the jury.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).