Sixth Circuit· 6/12/2024
United States v. Peter Bolos
Citations
- 104 F.4th 562
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting the defendant’s reliance on Ciminelli where the indictment alleged that the scheme’s purpose was “to obtain large sums of money”
- rejecting the defendant’s reliance on Ciminelli where the indictment alleged that the scheme’s purpose was “to obtain large sums of money”
- rejecting the defendant’s reliance on Ciminelli where the indictment alleged that the scheme’s purpose was “to obtain large sums of money”
- rejecting the defendant’s reliance on Ciminelli where the indictment alleged that the scheme’s purpose was “to obtain large sums of money”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court· 2000-06-28· cited 1,399×
- Coleman v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 2012-05-29· cited 1,016×
- Deal v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-05-17· cited 701×
- Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1987-11-16· cited 684×
- Cleveland v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2000-11-07· cited 390×
- United States v. HuntSixth Circuit· 2008-04-11· cited 126×
- United States v. Shellef and RubensteinSecond Circuit· 2007-11-08· cited 95×
- United States v. Alvin RaySixth Circuit· 2015-09-23· cited 89×
- Kelly v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2020-05-07· cited 79×
- Webb v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1919-03-03· cited 78×
- Ciminelli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2023-05-11· cited 48×
- United States v. Nancy SadlerSixth Circuit· 2014-04-24· cited 32×
- United States v. Robin PeavlerSixth Circuit· 2018-08-20· cited 30×
- United States v. Roger AndersonSixth Circuit· 2023-04-17· cited 22×
- United States v. Lesa ChaneySixth Circuit· 2019-04-11· cited 20×
- United States v. NazirS.D. Florida· 2002-07-16· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.