United States v. Perry County Board of Education, Joann Parsons, Movants-Appellants

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming denial of motion to intervene based on board's policy decision because petitioners failed to allege that school board action impeded achievement of unitary school system
• “Appellants are not entitled to intervention of right simply because they would have voted differently had they been members of these representative bodies.”
• denial of intervention without hearing proper where intervenors sought to challenge construction site of new school
• denial of intervention without hearing proper where intervenors sought to challenge construction site of new school
• “[P]arents seeking to question deficiencies in the implementation of school desegregation orders should seek intervention rather than bring a class action.”
• “There is no clear-cut test to determine the 4 nature of the interest required for intervention of right. Our inquiry is a flexible one, which 5 focuses on the particular facts and circumstances surrounding each application.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).