United States v. Perry
Citations
- 146 U.S. 71
- 13 S. Ct. 26
- 36 L. Ed. 890
- 1892 U.S. LEXIS 2176
Syllabus
<p>Paintings upon glass, consisting of pieces of variously colored glass, cut into irregular shapes and fastened together by strips of lead, painted by artists of superior merit especially trained for the work, representing biblical subjects and characters and intended to be used as windows in a religious institution, imported in fragments to be put together in this country in the form of such windows, are subject to the duty of 45 per cent imposed by paragraph 122 of the tariff act of October I, 1890, 26 Stat. 573, c. 1244, upon stained or painted window glass and stained or painted glass windows wholly or partly manufactured, and not specially provided for in this act; and not to the duty imposed by paragraph 677, 26 Stat. 608, c. 1244, upon paintings specially imported in good faith for the use of any society or institution established for religious purposes, and not intended for sale.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that painted glass windows were, for tariff purposes, “decorative and industrial, rather than among the fine, arts”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown After Stating the Case
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mazer v. SteinSupreme Court· 1954-04-12· cited 560×
- United States v. OlivottiCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1916-03-28· cited 31×
- United States v. DowningCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1916-02-21· cited 24×
- Frei Art Glass Co. v. UnitedCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1927-05-19· cited 24×
- F. Lunning, Inc. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1957-12-05· cited 9×
- Reardon v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1922-01-13· cited 7×
- Mission of San Gabriel v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1960-04-26· cited 6×
- Perry v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1915-05-18· cited 4×
- Paternostro v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1941-05-02· cited 3×
- A. N. Khouri & Bro. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1938-08-03· cited 2×
- International Clearing House of New York, Inc. v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1938-09-28· cited 2×
- United States v. Davies, Turner & Co.First Circuit· 1910-03-04· cited 2×
- Spiers v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1959-09-25· cited 1×
- Brantman v. United StatesU.S. Customs Court· 1965-06-04· cited 1×
- Mayers, Osterwald & Muhlfeld (Inc.) v. BendlerCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1930-06-04
- Cassard Romano Co. v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1931-11-02
- Alexander & Oviatt v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1933-05-01
- United States v. Columbo Co.Customs and Patent Appeals· 1933-06-12
- States v. StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1934-04-16
- United States v. International Harvester Co.Customs and Patent Appeals· 1935-04-29
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.