Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 11/7/1892

United States v. Perry

Citations

  • 146 U.S. 71
  • 13 S. Ct. 26
  • 36 L. Ed. 890
  • 1892 U.S. LEXIS 2176

Syllabus

<p>Paintings upon glass, consisting of pieces of variously colored glass, cut into irregular shapes and fastened together by strips of lead, painted by artists of superior merit especially trained for the work, representing biblical subjects and characters and intended to be used as windows in a religious institution, imported in fragments to be put together in this country in the form of such windows, are subject to the duty of 45 per cent imposed by paragraph 122 of the tariff act of October I, 1890, 26 Stat. 573, c. 1244, upon stained or painted window glass and stained or painted glass windows wholly or partly manufactured, and not specially provided for in this act; and not to the duty imposed by paragraph 677, 26 Stat. 608, c. 1244, upon paintings specially imported in good faith for the use of any society or institution established for religious purposes, and not intended for sale.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that painted glass windows were, for tariff purposes, “decorative and industrial, rather than among the fine, arts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown After Stating the Case

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.