Skip to main content
· 1/20/1988

United States v. Perez-Paredes

Citations

  • 678 F. Supp. 259
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1191
  • 1988 WL 8971

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that \Metz narrowly restricts both Ledet and Newsom to their facts and ... rejects the notion that newly available evidence is synonymous with newly discovered evidence for the purposes of a motion for a new trial\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spellman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.