United States v. Perez-Molina

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that district court did not err in disregarding § 4A1.3 because it also relied on other § 3553(a) factors in imposing sentence that doubled high end of guidelines range
• affirming sentence more than double the guidelines range that was imposed based on “the particular need to deter [the defendant] from further reentry”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).