United States v. Percy E. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that we review findings of defendant’s competency for clear error
• calling the hurdle “ ‘nearly insurmountable’ ” (quot- ing United States v. Frazier, 213 F.3d 409, 416 (7th Cir. 2000)
• rejecting the defendant’s chain-of-custody argument, and providing that “[a] perfect chain of custody is not a prerequisite to admission, as gaps in the chain normally go to the weight of the evidence rather than its admissibility” (alteration in original
• there is a “nearly insurmountable hurdle” to prevailing on a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence
• “ ‘Waiver precludes appellate review, but forfeiture permits review for plain error.’ ” (quoting United States v. Jaimes-Jaimes, 406 F.3d 845, 847 (7th Cir. 2005))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).