United States v. Peraza-Carrillo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a creditor violates the automatic stay willfully when it has knowledge of the bankruptcy and it fails to take possible and necessary action to prevent the continuation of the collection process
• \The creditor does not need formal notice of the existence of the bankruptcy to have knowledge of the case .... \
• “It is the responsibility of the user of any computer program to ensure it is functioning properly.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).