United States v. Pepper & Potter, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting recusal motion although judge had “no current recollection of the extent of my participation in the underlying investigation”
• recusal required when judge was the U.S. Attorney at the time of the indictment and involvement \was not merely of a pro forma nature\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).