United States v. Pedro Pablo Mesa, A.K.A. Tito, A.K.A. Pablo Mesa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an argument regarding a downward sentencing 18 Case: 18-13762 Date Filed: 07/13/2020 Page: 19 of 22 adjustment fell outside the scope of remand, because the limited mandate “did not vacate [the defendant’s] sentence in its entirety”
• finding that the defendant claimed “a greater share of the profits,” as he was “the source of the [drugs sold]”
• noting that waiver may be over- come by the mandate on remand
• “The district court must implement both the letter and spirit of the mandate, taking into consideration our opinion and the circumstances it embraces.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).