Skip to main content
· 3/1/1999

United States v. Pedro Martinez, Iii, A/K/A Pete

Citations

  • 169 F.3d 1049
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 3141
  • 1999 WL 101577

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling the court need not address allegations unsupported by “meaningful legal and factual arguments”
  • attorney’s failure to inform client that he was ineligible for boot camp was not deficient performance for the purposes of an ineffective assistance claim
  • “[A]n attorney’s mere inaccurate prediction of a sentence does not demonstrate the deficiency component of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim.”
  • “[A]n attorney’s mere inaccurate prediction of sentence does not demonstrate the deficiency component of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim.”
  • “[A]n attorney’s mere inaccurate prediction of a sentence does not demonstrate the deficiency component of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • attorney’s failure to inform client that he was ineligible for boot camp was not deficient performance for the purposes of an ineffective assistance claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Easterbrook, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.