United States v. Pedro Angel Gomez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• invalidating defendant-reinitiated questioning following post- Miranda interrogation in absence of significant passage of time or release from custody
• reasoning that prior firearm convictions were admissible to show that the defendant “was aware of the dangers of and law relating to concealed weapons and [to] rebut [his] claim that the gun was for an innocent purpose and its presence was mere accident or coinci- dence”
• observing that coconspirators possessed each others' telephone numbers
• evidence of earlier conviction for possession of firearms relevant to new charge of same because it tends to rebut defense that possession was \mere accident or coincidence\
• statement obtained less than a few minutes after Edwards violation involuntary as a matter of law
• ”[T]he agents here continued to talk to Gomez, stressing the importance of cooperating.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).