United States v. Pecoraro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that anecdotes of “eleven out of 140 prospective class members is not sufficiently large sample to show that discrimination in personnel decisions ‘was the company’s standard operating procedure.’”
• “To hold [one hundred and forty] individual race-discrimination trials would certainly be a great deal less efficient than consolidation into a single action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).