United States v. Paz-Alvarez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a statute cannot criminalize conduct “in terms so vague that men of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application’” (citations omitted)
• rejecting appellant’s Alleyne argument based upon a review of the jury instructions in their totality
• “There are many ways to show that a defendant intended to join and advance a conspiracy, even where the defendant never actually handled the drugs.”
• arguments from motions incorporated by reference waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).