Skip to main content
· 1/12/2000

United States v. Paula L. Buford

Citations

  • 201 F.3d 937
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 320
  • 2000 WL 16953

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming district court’s conclusion that prior sentences were not consolidated where “separate sentences were imposed and separate judgments entered.”
  • affirming district court’s conclusion that prior sentences were not consolidated where \separate sentences were imposed and separate judgments entered.\
  • finding no clear error where “elements of [the defendant’s] situation supported] either characterization.”
  • finding no clear error where \elements of [the defendant’s] situation support[ed] either characterization.\
  • finding no consolidation where court entered separate judgments and sentences

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eschbach, Easterbrook, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.