· 1/12/2000
United States v. Paula L. Buford
Citations
- 201 F.3d 937
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 320
- 2000 WL 16953
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming district court’s conclusion that prior sentences were not consolidated where “separate sentences were imposed and separate judgments entered.”
- affirming district court’s conclusion that prior sentences were not consolidated where \separate sentences were imposed and separate judgments entered.\
- finding no clear error where “elements of [the defendant’s] situation supported] either characterization.”
- finding no clear error where \elements of [the defendant’s] situation support[ed] either characterization.\
- finding no consolidation where court entered separate judgments and sentences
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eschbach, Easterbrook, Rovner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.