United States v. Paul W. Mischler, Carol L. Mischler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• approving use of writ of error coram nobis to challenge restitution order that was based on inaccurate information
• reversing where district court failed to ask defendant whether he had opportunity to read and discuss PSI with defense counsel
• approving use of writ of error coram nobis to challenge restitution order
• “[The] writ of 26 error coram nobis is authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (1981
• “[The] 3 writ of error coram nobis is authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (1981) – the all writs 4 provision of the Judicial Code. While the writ was abolished in 1946 by the amendment 5 of Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), it retains its vitality in criminal proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).