United States v. Paul W. Gibson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a union official's demand for a personal payment of $750 as “consideration” for eliminating any potential union activity at a nonunion job site was a request for a payoff within the meaning of the Hobbs Act
• “[A]ny attempt to define ‘reasonable doubt’ will probably trigger a constitutional challenge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).