United States v. Paul Solofa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• collecting cases and stating that \every circuit to consider the issue has held that the [cross reference] covers attempts\
• no prejudice shown and no need for further evidentiary development when the record established that the defendant had no “viable” defense to pursue
• “If it is easier to dispose of an ineffectiveness claim on the ground of lack of sufficient prejudice, which we expect will often be so, that course should be followed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).