United States v. Paul Solina and Ronnie Bruscino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We are inclined to defer to [the judge’s] intuition [regarding defendant’s intent to delay on the eve of trial], but in any event believe that the scheduling problems the continuances would have caused were in themselves sufficient ground for refusing to delay the trial.”
• \If at the last minute he gets cold feet and wants a lawyer to defend him he runs the risk that the judge will hold him to his original decision in order to avoid the disruption of the court’s schedule.\
• “We are inclined to defer to [the judge’s] intuition [regarding defendant’s intent to delay on the eve of trial], but in any event believe that the scheduling problems the continuances would have caused were in themselves sufficient ground for refusing to delay the trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).