United States v. Paul Rice, Pedro Alvarez, John Leslie Wells, Jr., and Jerold Massler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court did not err in refusing to compel a witness to submit to an interview by defense counsel because “[a]ll that a defendant is entitled to is access to a prospective witness”
• “All that a defendant is entitled to is access to a prospective witness. This right, however, exists co-equally with the witnesses’ right to refuse to say anything.”
• jury’s request was conceivably for over 2000 pages of transcript

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).