Skip to main content
· 3/15/1988

United States v. Paul Ochs, Jr., United States of America v. Richard Dray

Citations

  • 842 F.2d 515
  • 25 Fed. R. Serv. 238
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3249
  • 1988 WL 20898

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “With the issue squarely before it, the [McNally] Court held that the mere fact a fiduciary profits from a breach of duty is not a sufficient property deprivation to satisfy the requirements of the mail fraud statute if the property was not directly or indirectly at the principal’s expense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bownes, Aldrich, Torruella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.