United States v. Paul N. Johnson Darryl Jonns Lamont Bell and Craig Richardson, Paul N. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining, pre-Whren, that officer’s testimony that he conducted a traffic stop pursuant to § 4524(c) when he saw several large air fresheners hanging from rearview mirror was 16 more than sufficient to provide the officer with “articulable and reasonable suspicion” of a § 4524(c
• \once the defendant has established a basis for his motion . . . the burden shifts to the government to show that the search or seizure was reasonable\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).