Skip to main content
· 2/1/1988

United States v. Paul M. Baldinger

Citations

  • 838 F.2d 176
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 1195
  • 1988 WL 5622

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the mail fraud statute, which has virtually identical language to the wire fraud statute, “was intended by the Congress only to reach schemes that have as their goal the transfer of something of economic value to the defendant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Engel, Kennedy, Contie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.