United States v. Paul L. Cafaro and Richard Schulman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that improper testimony that “was not referred to in any later testimony and was not mentioned in the prosecutor’s summation, was harmless error”
• concluding that improper testimony that “was not referred to in any later testimony and was not mentioned in the prosecutor’s summation, was harmless error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).