United States v. Paul Espinoza Hernandez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that rule 41(e) does not apply to civil actions
• affirming dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because due process claims regarding the seizure are properly liti- gated during the forfeiture proceeding
• “the proper place to litigate the legality of [a] seizure [and forfeiture] is in the forfeiture proceeding.”
• “[T]he proper place to litigate the legality of [a] seizure [and forfeiture] is in the forfeiture proceeding.”’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).