First Circuit· 5/27/1998

United States v. Paul E. Lowe

Citations

145 F.3d 45
49 Fed. R. Serv. 687
1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 10903
1998 WL 256993

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that the district court’s curative instruction that a closing argument was not evidence, “adequately addressed” the defendant’s concerns regarding any misstatement
curative instruction limited any potential damage from the prosecutor’s erroneous statement that the victim had recounted all the details of the crime to one of the witnesses
no implied bias where juror in rape case was a survivor of attempted rape
no abuse of discretion where juror said, “I don’t think so” in response to judge’s question whether her prior experience as survivor of attempted rape would affect her ability to serve on jury in rape case
\Consent is a defense to kidnapping . . . .\
“ ‘otherwise’ can include sexual gratification”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Aldrich, Boudin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.