United States v. Paul E. Lowe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the district court’s curative instruction that a closing argument was not evidence, “adequately addressed” the defendant’s concerns regarding any misstatement
• curative instruction limited any potential damage from the prosecutor’s erroneous statement that the victim had recounted all the details of the crime to one of the witnesses
• no implied bias where juror in rape case was a survivor of attempted rape
• no abuse of discretion where juror said, “I don’t think so” in response to judge’s question whether her prior experience as survivor of attempted rape would affect her ability to serve on jury in rape case
• \Consent is a defense to kidnapping . . . .\
• “ ‘otherwise’ can include sexual gratification”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).