United States v. Paul David Logan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that evidence of prior drug possession “is admissible to show such things as knowledge and intent of a defendant charged with a crime in which intent to distribute drugs is an element”
• suggesting that a limiting instruction is more effective when given prior to the testimony being entered
• suggesting that a limiting instruction is more effective when given prior to the testimony being entered
• finding that \evidence of prior possession of drugs ... is admissible to show such things as knowledge and intent of a defendant charged with a crime in which intent to distribute drugs is an element\
• noting that “prior possession of drugs, even in an amount consistent only with personal use, is admissible to show such things as knowledge and intent of a defendant charged with a crime in which intent to distribute drugs is an element”
• \prior possession of drugs ... is admissible to show such things as knowledge\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).