Skip to main content
· 5/3/1991

United States v. Paul Chartier

Citations

  • 933 F.2d 111
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 8798
  • 1991 WL 70832

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • vacating the sentence and remanding because, though record contained some discussion of the judge's reasoning, district court did not \fully comply with the requirement\ of § 3553(c)(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feinberg, McLAUGHLIN, Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.