· 5/3/1991
United States v. Paul Chartier
Citations
- 933 F.2d 111
- 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 8798
- 1991 WL 70832
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- vacating the sentence and remanding because, though record contained some discussion of the judge's reasoning, district court did not \fully comply with the requirement\ of § 3553(c)(1)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Feinberg, McLAUGHLIN, Newman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.