Skip to main content
· 1/3/2001

United States v. Paul C. Kurtz

Citations

  • 237 F.3d 154
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 33

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming use of application note 14 to justify obstruction enhancement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oakes, Kearse, Korman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.